/
RSS Feed
Jamie and John dive into the world of AI-generated video and its implications for creativity and society. They discuss the capabilities of Sora, an AI system capable of seamless video creation, and explore its potential impact on the VFX industry, the importance of human artistry in guiding AI tools, and the ethical concerns surrounding AI-generated content.
SocTalk is produced by Jamie Sundance & Zhaklina Velcheva at the Robert Gordon University School of Computing.
Key Points and Discussion Topics:
- Sora’s Capabilities: Jamie explains how Sora uses diffusion models to analyze video as four-dimensional spacetime patches. This allows for remarkable consistency and seamless transitions in generating visuals, like a swimming turtle morphing into a butterfly.
- Emergent Simulation: The ability to simulate realistic visuals without explicit training is discussed, with examples like coastal highways and woolly mammoth animations. John points out limitations like static trees despite wind and waves.
- Uncanny Valley: Some outputs fall into the uncanny valley, where overly realistic elements disrupt the suspension of disbelief. Jamie mentions an example with a perfectly animated foot juxtaposed with a stylized upper body. John connects this to the concept of the uncanny valley.
- AI vs. Human Learning: Jamie questions if AI learning aligns with human learning, which involves building complex mental models. John counters that human learning is inductive, while large language models might be different.
- AI and Dreams: An intriguing parallel is drawn between AI-generated imagery and dreams, particularly with the lack of accurate hand representation in both. This sparks a discussion about lucid dreaming and the potential for coincidence versus a deeper connection.
- Fractal Recursion: The conversation extends to the topic of fractal patterns observed in nature, physics, and psychedelia. They consider how these patterns might guide the models we construct for understanding the universe.
- AI’s Impact on VFX Industry: Jamie predicts Sora’s potential to democratize high-quality visual effects for smaller studios. John, using the analogy of particle effects software, argues that it might not replace professionals but rather raise the bar for quality as audiences become accustomed to better outputs.
- AI vs. Artistic Control: Jamie emphasizes the importance of strong creative direction when using AI tools, advocating for deliberate design and unique aesthetics over generic AI-generated content.
- AI Writing Tools and Student Work: John criticizes the vapid content produced by large language models used by students for assignments. He emphasizes that effective writing requires expertise, regardless of the tool.
- The Two-Year-Old Argument: John criticizes knee-jerk resistance to technological change. He compares it to a toddler’s “no” phase, and suggests a more informed approach to assess the potential of new technologies.
- AI as a Tool, Not a Replacement: AI tools, like Sora, will change the creative landscape, but they cannot inherently produce high-quality results. Audiences will continue to discern between generic AI-generated content and the work of artists who expertly iterate and refine AI output.
- The Value of the Human Story: The story behind a piece of art, the human effort and time poured into it, is what makes it valuable. AI-generated art that lacks this element is inherently less desirable. John offers the analogy of recreated whisky – even if perfectly duplicated, it doesn’t carry the same weight as aged originals.
- The Willy Wonka Debacle: The “Willy’s Chocolate Experience” in Scotland serves as an AI misuse example. The event was heavily promoted with AI-generated materials, but failed to deliver, showcasing how pure reliance on AI can produce deceptive and disappointing results.
“You Need A Sock – A Windsock” ccby John N A Brown, 2023
“VaqueroCaballero” ccby John N A Brown, 2024